|
How 1st
September would’ve been
1st Ramadan
By______________________________________________________________________________________
IN defense of my
Standard Islamic Lunar Calendar 1429 AH (about one thousand in
circulation) and predictions of some Islamic dates published by New
Nigerian Newspapers on Friday, August 8, 2008, under the headline–
Ramadan 1429 AH (Islamic Lunar Calendar), page 31 and Daily Trust
Newspapers on Monday, August 25, under the headline- Talking Ramadan
1429AH, page 10; I write to say that, physical and scientific
observation of the moon as it emerges into Maiduguri (Nigeria) sky,
clearly suggest that the actual 1st Ramadan, 1429 AH is equivalent
to September 1, 2008 AD. On Monday, September 1, 2008 was the first
day that the new crescent moon became visible to most people in
Nigeria, basic knowledge of astronomy suggest that the previous day
Sunday, August 31, 2008 i.e. equivalent to 30th Sha’aban, 1429 AH
was the only possible day to have sighted the new crescent moon,
because if witnesses claim to have sighted the moon today then, most
of those concerned are expected to sight it the following day
effortlessly.
To scientifically determine the equivalent Islamic date based on the
position of the moon on the said date (September 1, 2008), a 4x60mm
Zubairu telescope is used to focus the moon and parallax eliminated.
The reading on vertical calibration of the instrument shows that the
moon subtended an angle of about 15.0 degrees and, that was the
total angle gained in its easterly direction above west horizon,
about 30 minutes after sunset as reference time. It was also
observed that the part of the orbit where the new crescent was
located was inclined southwards of the ecliptic (sun pathway) and
that could be responsible for its slight decrease in expected
initial angle. Study shows that, orbit of the moon does not have a
fixed orientation in space, the orbit changes its inclination from a
maximum angle of 5.0 degrees north and 5.0 degrees south of the
ecliptic for a period of two weeks on each side. Daily one lap gain
in eastward direction of the moon is accepted as 12.2 degrees
(Wyatt, 77; online lunar calendar - Wikipedia, 07).
Using the available pieces of information suggest that if one day
lap gain of the moon as accepted is 12.2 degrees in its eastward
movement, then if one day lap is deducted or in other words, if the
moon is reversed from Monday, September 1, 2008 by one day lap, the
location of the moon on Sunday, August 31, 2008 is easily determined
to be at about 2.8 degrees above the horizon (15.0 – 12.2 = 2.8)
and, further deduction of another day by one lap of 12.2 degrees,
suggest that on Saturday, August 30, 2008, the position of the moon
at a mean distance of 380,000 kilometers away from earth is at 350.6
or 9.4 degrees (about 60,000 kilometers) below west horizon
(0.0/360.0 line). Since no normal human being resident on earth can
see below the horizon especially at that location of great distance,
then the only suggested possible day and time to sight the new
crescent in Nigeria is only on August 31, 2008 at about 2.8 degrees
above the horizon, 30 minutes after sunset. A subtle theory in
astronomy suggest that, if the moon in any country subtend 15.0
degrees above west horizon on Sunday, August 31, 2008 at about 30
minutes after sunset, it is expected to equally subtend same angle
on the same reference Gregorian date of most location around the
globe, 30 minutes after their own sunset, regardless of time zone
(Wyatt, 77). Therefore, this submission is a clear corroboration of
the fact that, claim by just two or three countries (always
including Nigeria) on earth to have sighted the moon without
reasonable number of others cannot be accepted rationally.
Therefore, the above discussion which suggests 1st Ramadan, 1429 AH
is equivalent to September 1, 2008 as scientifically determined in
Nigeria is expected to be so in most part of the world or the other
way round.
The claim to have earlier sighted the moon by one day (i.e. August
31, 2008) in Nigeria is unbelievable and does not make any logical
sense in the course of my research on Standard Islamic Lunar
Calendar as a suggested harmonised calendar for use by all Muslims
worldwide. It is obvious that there is no mystery around the moon
whenever it approaches Nigerian sky line, but clear display of lack
of appropriate knowledge. It is obtainable in the Hadith that the
Islamic month which is the month of lunar phases is having 29 days.
Astronomy also suggests that the synodic month which is the month of
lunar phases or shapes of the moon is 29.50 (twenty nine and half)
days. Logically the two statements are talking about the same 29 and
not 28 or 30 days. Furthermore, it is obtainable in the Hadith that
if the moon is not sighted on the 29th day, consider the month to be
of 30 days. Similarly, astronomy suggest that, the synodic month is
29.5 days when the earth-moon system is observed from space research
station, but its visible phases can only be sighted by man resident
on earth in alternating 29 and 30 days termed hollow and full
respectively (Wikipedia, 2007 ).
Is science in Islam? It appears like that and if so, scientific
suggestion should be appreciated in Islam for verification. Science
helps us to unravel some mysteries of nature as much as possible and
seeking for knowledge in general is Islamic and in order to
facilitate and enhance our understanding of the environment (natural
laws) we are living in and for proper application where suitable.
The lunar revolution is governed by natural laws (Allah’s laws or
Will of Allah) like moon having an average speed of 3700 km/h
(kilometer per hour), gaining 12.2 degrees daily in eastward
direction indefinitely. These are the kind of ‘Will of Allah’ we
should be talking about nowadays not that forwarded by those that
always hide there ignorance behind ‘it is the Will of Allah’ that
they see or do impossible things that cannot be subjected to any
experiment at anytime. Every normal human being can sight the new
crescent moon if keen about it.
Ignorance in lunar revolution was observed towards the end of
Sha’ban in this Islamic year when it was considered in Nigeria that
Sha’aban has 29 days and Saturday, August 30, 2008 AD is the last
day of the Islamic month and is equivalent to 29th Sha’aban, 1429
AH, then Sunday August 31, 2008 considered as 1st Ramadan, 1429 AH.
An Islamic preacher in Maiduguri made his followers to also believe
that Sha’aban has 29 days but in his own case Sunday, August 31,
2008 is equivalent to 29th Sha’ban, 1429 AH as the last day of the
Islamic month then, the following day September 1, 2008 is
considered 1st Ramadan, 1429 AH.
Scientific calculation based on interpretation of readings as a
result of practical observation and supported by accepted theories
clearly suggest that, the 29th day of the lunar calendar was
equivalent to Saturday, August 30, 2008 when the moon was in
conjunction (i.e. sun, earth and moon fall into a straight line and
no part of the world can be used to sight the moon because the moon
was in complete shadow of the earth cast by the sun.). Conjunction
known as new moon in astronomy occur once in every 29.50 (twenty and
half) days i.e. the synodic month. But what appears to be the
concern of Muslims is the first appearance of the new crescent as
the moon gets out of conjunction to the next first appearance.
Researchers including me accept that the conjunction is always
formed on the 29th day of the lunar calendar and also the new
crescent is also out on the same day and can only be visible between
20 and 30 minutes after sunset. But the time of occurrence of
conjunction and appearance of new crescent definitely influence the
possibility of sighting the crescent which set before or after the
sun. If the new crescent sets before the sun then, nobody sights the
reflected beam of sun rays from its exposed crescent shaped body
till the following day when it will become 30 days, but if the sun
sets before the new crescent, there is the possibility of sighting
it on the 29th day. This Islamic year, my research suggest that
August 30, 2008 is equivalent to 29th Sha’ban, 1429 AH, on that day
the moon set before the sun and was at a location below the horizon
after sunset as discussed above. This further suggest that the
following day August 31, 2008 was 30th Sha’ban 1429 AH, the only
possible day to sight the new crescent moon, therefore September 1,
2007 became equivalent to 1st Ramadan, 1429 AH. On Sunday, September
14, 2008, actual reading of lunar position by me is about 176
degrees from west horizon, 30 minutes after sunset. This location
suggests 29th September, 2008 should be expected to be equivalent to
29th Ramadan, 1429AH and also it is the possible day to start
expecting sighting the new crescent of the month of Shawwal because
the sun will set before the moon on that day, therefore 1st Shawwal,
1429 AH is expected to be equivalent to September 30, 2008. For
example, if 360 degrees is our reference end point (horizon) on
lunar orbit and telescope reading shows that the moon has covered
176 degrees. Then, distance (in degrees) left is 360 -176 = 184.
Daily one day lap is accepted as 12.2 degrees, if that is the case,
then distance left which is 184 degrees divide by 12.2 degrees is
equal to 15.3 days as the number of days required to reach the west
horizon from Sunday, September 14, 2008 using 30 minutes after
sunset as reference time.
From all indications Islam is founded on knowledge (science). As a
matter of fact, Islam denounces any action which is anti knowledge
or unscientific. Islam a divine faith teaches man what could be
described as ‘a scientific way of life.’ In a unique pattern Islam
advanced several scientific theories. It strongly encourages man to
investigate, even faith itself scientifically, which is
intellectually by inquiring into the content in a wholesome manner.
Ponder they not on the (content of the) Qu’ran? If it were from a
source other than Allah, they would have discovered in it many a
discrepancy (Qu’ran 4:82).The Qur’an showers praise on people of
knowledge and reproves the ignorant ones.
Now, those of us that have become aware and convinced through this
submission which has established scientifically that actual 1st
Ramadan, 1429 AH is equivalent to September 1, 2008 AD, which means
fasting officially started in error and may officially end in error
on the 28 the September, 2008, then it is our responsibility to
request the authorities as a matter of religious duty to comment on
the initial error since Islam seems to encourages and accepts
scientific verification as suggested above.
To reduce the reoccurrence of this phenomenon, a national committee
of scientists, and Islamic scholars with adequate understanding of
Sharia regulations needs to be formed to harmonise their
understanding of lunar calendar for making relevant suggestions to
appropriate authorities. Alternatively, creation of a directorate
for research on lunar revolution for Islamic purpose as community
service under National Space Research and Development Agency, NASRDA,
Abuja; would be of great help.
Zubairu is of the Department of Physics, University of Maiduguri,
Borno state
zubairusalihu@yahoo.com
08038522693, 08052850698.
|
|
Johnny, we hardly know ye
THERE’S a candidate in this presidential race who
remains a mystery — hazy, undefined, so full of contradictions that
voters may see electing him as an enormous risk. I’m referring to
the cipher known as John McCain.
View Only Top Items in This Story
In fact, there are some basic things about McCain that apparently
even McCain doesn’t know. Asked Wednesday by reporters from Politico
how many houses he and his wealthy wife, Cindy, own, McCain
responded, “I think — I’ll have my staff get to you.” The correct
answer seems to be in the neighborhood of seven, but who’s counting?
I don’t begrudge McCain his multiple residences or his $520
Ferragamo shoes. I understand that he was just being flippant and
unresponsive when he said at the Saddleback forum last weekend that
being rich meant having an income of at least $5 million a year. But
it’s a stretch, to say the least, for McCain to portray himself as a
Regular Joe while painting Barack Obama as some kind of jet-set
celebrity.
It’s understandable that McCain would want to fuzz this aspect of
his biography; at a moment of great economic dislocation and
anxiety, people might question your ability to feel their pain if
they know that your net worth may be somewhere north of $100
million. Much less comprehensible, and much more troubling, is
McCain’s habit of “Straight Talking” himself into the wilderness.
When it was pointed out that McCain’s pronouncements on the economy
often do not conform to his official positions, the candidate’s
chief economic adviser indicated that we should pay attention to the
authorized version — despite the fact that McCain “has certainly I’m
sure said things in town halls” that might deviate.
In other words, don’t pay such strict attention to what McCain says
because he doesn’t speak officially for his own campaign. No wonder
he was so insistent on trying to lure Obama into a series of town
hall encounters, where Obama might feel constrained by such
irrelevancies as consistency and arithmetic.
I guess McCain’s unreliability as a spokesman for himself on the
issue that voters tell pollsters they care most about should come as
no surprise, given his earlier confession — since retracted, sort of
— that he doesn’t really understand economics that well. He is
supposed to be an expert on foreign affairs and national security,
however — and here, too, the cannon has come unbelayed and is
rolling perilously around the deck.
“We are all Georgians,” McCain said in response to the Russian
invasion. It was an attempt to define the moment with a memorable
line, reminiscent of JFK’s famous declaration in Berlin. If McCain
was just trying to burnish his commander-in-chief credentials while
Obama vacationed in Hawaii, okay, fine, that’s politics. If he was
serious, though, he needs to clarify the unsettling implications of
what he intended to be a stirring phrase. Precisely what was being
stirred?
Not the hopes and ambitions of the people of Georgia; by then, they
had already realized that despite all the Bush administration’s
freedom rhetoric, nobody was coming to save them. Certainly not
war-weary American voters.
What McCain successfully roiled was the nationalism and bitter
nostalgia for great-power status that simmer below the surface of
Russian public opinion. Strongman Vladimir Putin plays these
sentiments like a violin. A candidate for president of the United
States should not further strengthen Putin’s hand — and thus make
the next president’s job that much harder.
For months, McCain has been arguing for measures that would isolate
Russia. He then called the Georgia invasion “the first probably
serious crisis internationally since the end of the Cold War.” If he
doesn’t want to help start a new Cold War, you can’t tell from his
loose rhetoric.
I’m leaving aside his mini-misstatements in which he confused Sunnis
with Shiites or otherwise garbled salient facts about Iraq. What
alarms me is the pattern of inconsistency. One day he’s soothing,
the next he’s abrasive. One day he makes a flat-out pledge not to
raise taxes, the next he says that everything is on the table as far
as Social Security is concerned. One day the buck stops here, the
next he’s not authorized to speak for, ahem, himself.
It’s true that John McCain has been around a long time. But do we
really know what he’d do as president? Do we really know who he is?
eugenerobinson@washpost.com
©2005 New Nigerian Newspapers Limited.
Webmasters: Suleiman A. Adamu &
Emmanuel Bello |