Published Since January 1, 1966         ... Pioneering Responsible Journalism

  Home  News  Opinions  Special Sections  Columns  Features  Interviews  Advert Rates  About Us  Contact Us

News

National News
International News
Sports
Politics
Business & Economy
Around Nigeria
Around Abuja
Around Lagos

Special Sections

Agriculture
A la Carte
Aviation
Banking & Finance
Echoes From The Dome
Education
Energy
Environment
Health & Medicine
Islam
Law
Maritime
Motoring
Property
Science & Nature
Special Reports
Women & Family

Opinions

Editorial
Letters/Issues
Opinions

Columns

Every Monday
Mind your grammar
Down to Earth
 
 
 
 
 

EVERY TUESDAY

Posted: Tuesday July 1, 2008


 


 

The role of free press in our democracy (I)

The concept of a free press is universally considered an indispensable and integral part of any democracy. It is no secret that our constitutional democracy mirror’s that of the United States of America. I find no better way to express the significance of a free press than through that articulated in 1971, by Justice Hugo L. Black, in the case involving the New York Times and the United States. In that case the U.S Government sought to censor a New York Times article that sought to reveal secrets relating to the Vietnam War.
In his eloquent ruling, the justice noted among others that “The press was to serve the governed not the governors. The government’s power to sensor the press was abolished so that the press would remain forever free to sensor the government. The press was protected so that it could bare the secrets of government to inform the people. Only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government and paramount among the responsibilities of a free press is the duty to prevent any part of the government from deceiving the people and sending them off to distant lands to die .....” the above excerpt clearly expresses the true meaning of free press and how it ought to function.
Section 22 of the 1999 Nigerian Constitution gives identical powers to the Nigerian press, it states, “The press, radio, television and other agencies of the mass media shall at all times be free to uphold the fundamental objectives contained in this chapter, and uphold the responsibility and accountability of the government to the people”. The responsibilities and freedom given to the Nigerian Press is strikingly similar. We must at this time measure the performance of the Nigerian Press vis-a-vis its responsibilities.
But first, it’s important to note that for one to exercise his or her duties and rights under any circumstance, he or she must know what the duties and the authority to perform them are. This is where it seems that the Nigerian Press needs some improvement.
On first impression, one could jump to the conclusion that the Nigerian Press is vibrant and free, but on a second look one finds a manipulated press, ready to care tar to the highest bidder and largely uninformed. Rather than play it’s role of a watch dog, it comfortably has chosen to be a lap dog.
Duties
Chapter 11 of the constitution starts with section 13 which stated “It shall be the duty and responsibility of all organs of government and of all authorities and person’s exercising legislative, executive or judicial powers to conform to, observe and apply the provisions of this constitution”.
This duty imposed by section 13 of chapter 2 is listed in sections 14 to 21 and in section 22, the constitution gives the right and freedom to ensure that the government complied as required by section 13.
It seems therefore reasonable to judge the press by the constitutionally expressed standards. So like the U.S Press, the role of the Nigeria Press must be that of a watch dog, employed and given the freedom to inform the public. It really can be construed the fourth arm of the government, whose existence is to keep the three arms honest and functioning.
One area that the Nigerian Press seems to function effectively is in the area of conveying information from the government to the people; through press releases and interviews etc. However it does not seem that the press understands that it has to be inquisitive and read between the lines, and go beyond what it is told in order to inform the public.
The government essentially sees the press as a tool for the furtherance of its agenda. This view point has resulted in several government officials openly advocating for partnership between them and the press. In making such statements the government with the acquiescence of the press, neglects the fact that both the government and the press exist for the public interest. Whereas the government has the right to publicize the good work it does, the press has the obligation to investigate the information and report to the public, or uncover the hidden things, after all the government belongs to the people.
However to adequately perform its function, the press must be informed. It must know that its function goes beyond reporting on unsubstantiated facts, it must understand its obligation to the people as enumerated in chapter 11 of the 1999 constitution. The press must also understand the art of investigative journalism. It must know that the judiciary is also a fair play in its reporting. It must not be swallowed up in the current euphoria sweeping the nation about the judiciary stepping up to the plate. Just as there is corruption in the executive and the legislative arm of the government, we must have a mindset that the same is applicable to the judiciary, and it is the responsibility of the press to uncover and report it.
Most of our newspapers are nothing but an extended arm of government and those they interview. With the exception of a few, serious thought is not given to questions that are asked the interviewees. Most interviews are nothing short of free advertisement. There is a disturbing tendency to report exactly what the government says, even when it is clear that the story is not accurate, so long as the individual is in power. But once out of power and out of favour, he is vilified after the damage is done.
The Obasanjo case
Since our former President Olusegun Obasanjo left office, he has become a favourite punching bag for the media. There have been allegations of looting the treasury; buying Nigerian assets in the name of privatization, cultism, sleeping with female political appointees etc. these and more allegations have been levelled at him. Some NGO’s have actually filed petitions with the E.F.C.C, calling for his indictment and prosecution.
The question must be asked if someone with such a dubious character would today be permitted to occupy such office if he had been exposed by the media before the fact or would the press play along and wait until he has finishes wrecking our economy. The point here is, why President Obasanjo was not reported by the press while he was committing the alleged crimes? Why did the press wait until after the damage has been done, at the expenses of Nigerians?
 


©2005 New Nigerian Newspapers Limited.