Click to open Gaskiya  Home Page Click to open Weekly  Home Page Click to open Daily Home Page  
  Published Since May 25, 1981         ... Pioneering Responsible Journalism

   Home News  Opinions  Art & Style  Special Sections  Sunday Sports Extra  Advert Rates  About Us  Contact Us

News

National News
International News
Sunday Sports Extra
Politics

Art & Style

Art News
Language
Lifestyle
Society
Relationships
Interview
Music
Movies
Craft of Fiction
Pot Pourri
Kada News
The Mystery of Godliness
Glorious Living

Special Sections

Features
Sunday Personality
The Representative

Opinions

Reflection
Perspective
Issues
Letters
Opinion
Centrestage
 
 
 
 

CENTRESTAGE

Posted Sunday June 29, 2008


Why is Nyako always in trouble?

THE political journey of the Adamawa State Governor, Admiral Murtala Hamman Yaro Nyako is, at several stages, turning out to be an albatross. Right from his nomination to contest for the governorship on the platform of Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to his first controversial victory which was quashed by an election tribunal and even up till now that he remains the winner of the re-run election which took place about two months ago, the man has only been swimming in and out of problems.
Nyako, just like General Muhammadu Buhari, took most people by surprise when he jumped into politics. As an elderly person who enjoyed a long and unblemished military career, he belongs to the class of those respected Nigerians who are always expected to keep their peace and, at most, play advisory roles in the governance of the country.
Moreover, having prestigiously served as a military governor in the early 70s, he should ordinarily not be going after the same position three decades later. Also as a successful farmer who was even once the national president of Practising Farmers Association of Nigeria, Nyako was not so idle or bankrupt that he needs to be in active politics to keep himself going or relevant.
When, therefore, either on his own or on the advice of others, he joined the game and even picked the gubernatorial ticket of the PDP, many people including some of his admirers considered the act as a sort of misnomer. They almost totally forgot that, afterall, the man has the constitutional right to vote and be voted for, all other considerations notwithstanding.
Now, the issue is no longer his entry into politics but how he is faring in it. He could turn all those his antecedents and elements of his personality considered as advantages into huge assets in politicking and governance and eventually make a substantial success of his new chosen career.
Nyako, unlike the other younger ones, does not have to either wait for his age to ripen or borrow experience from some other person(s) to be able to govern a state. He only needs to carry out some reflections, make comparisons and purify his intentions for him to successfully become a model and modern governor.
Something must have, therefore, been amiss that instead of being a complete success story, his tenure is constantly punctuated by serious hiccups that seek to undermine his personal integrity. Even if he has not yet realized it, the fact remains that whether or not his travails are caused by his adversaries within and outside the PDP, they are substantial enough to unmake him.
The allegations of “gross misconduct, abuse of office and fraudulent spending of public funds” are very weighty and therefore too much for a person like Nyako who laboured hard to build his integrity over several decades. The Adamawa State House of Assembly which is currently making strong moves to impeach him on account of these charges is simply trying to mess up the personality of the man.
The details of the allegations as catalogued in the impeachment notice signed by 20 out of the 25 members of the House show that the governor obtained, without the approval of the legislature, a loan amounting to six billion Naira and another one of five billion Naira from a bank with a repayment of over 4.5 million Naira per month. It is also further being alleged that Nyako ordered the freezing of accounts of Mayo Belwa local government in addition to the illegal deductions from the local governments’ joint accounts and award of contracts considered as frivolous and at inflated costs, all of which constitute impeachable offences.
Other such offences said to have been committed by the governor is the release of 141 million Naira for furnishing of his official residence which is yet to be executed and the purchase of high-breed maize from his Sebore farm at the cost of 42 million Naira. The House also frowned at the establishment of what it sees as the unconstitutional establishment of special projects directorate and the appointment of his own children as co-ordinators of the body and consequently pencilled it down as another big offence.
Even if, eventually, the House fails to substantiate all or even some of the allegations, the mere threat of the impeachment must have, somehow, traumatized the governor. Given the substance of his personality and the weight of his party, Nyako should not be seen in this kind of mess.
However, certain things which are, inter-connected must be working against the man thereby consistently putting him in trouble. And most likely, the man has aided his adversaries by committing some unconstitutional acts.
When his election was cancelled, it was all understood that the problem was caused by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) which erroneously omitted the name of the gubernatorial candidate of Action Congress, AC, Ibrahim Bapetel, from the ballot paper on the account of which the court nullified his victory. Even the members of the opposition parties in the state knew that error had nothing to do with the governor, albeit he was the worst victim of it.
But this particular one is completely different as the offences are allegedly committed by him and, worse still, within just two months. It is this kind of situation that politicians are always waiting for to hit at their opponents and it appears that AC which is the strongest opposition party in Adamawa State is at it.
The call by the former vice president and AC’s co-founder as well as its presidential candidate during last elections, Atiku Abubakar, on the anti-graft agencies to immediately commence action on the allegations is quite an expected response. By making attempt to impeach the governor, the State Assembly is only helping AC to execute a big project.
What is most interesting is the role the PDP-controlled presidency has begun to play in the attempt to resolve the matter. Several media reports show that the presidency convened a meeting between Nyako and the speaker of the State Assembly, Mr. James Barka and demanded them to bury the differences with a specific call on the legislature to withdraw the impeachment notice.
But this is where many people will have a big problem in trying to understand the real issues involved in the whole saga. When the lawmakers have already not only listed but also made public all such serious offences allegedly committed by the governor, Nigerians will be curious enough to see how they can just be withdrawn.
If, for example, the notice is to be withdrawn, then the House must have to admit that it has only lied against Nyako with all the devastating effects on its integrity. Or, in the alternative, the presidency or the PDP can boldly come out to say that, as valid as the allegations can be, the man will not be subjected to any kind of humiliation because he is one of our own. Either way, Nigerians must have to understand.
Otherwise, the intervention of the presidency is totally unnecessary because what is happening in Adamawa State is not an internal crisis of PDP or personal clash between Nyako and Barka. It is something that borders on the abuse of office by an elected chief executive of a state. What’s there for the PDP to do.

 


Cross-fire in Sokoto

EVEN before the emergence of Alhaji Aliyu Magatakarda Wamakko as the governor of Sokoto State on May 29, 2007, the relationship between him and the immediate past governor of the state, Alhaji Attahiru Dalhatu Bafarawa, was quite unmistakable. Although he was Bafarawa’s deputy for about seven years, the political differences that ensued between the two of them turned each one of them into a foe of the other.
Since the collapse of their political partnership which resulted in the exit of Wamakko from Bafarawa’s government, each one has built his own army of supporters whom they use to intimidate the other. And such supporters are really enjoying the assignment because they are apparently making something out of it.
But as the cross-fire between the two feuding camp goes on, the state is losing in terms of peaceful co-existence and political focus. Gradually the activities of the respective supporters of the two political leaders is turning the state into a kind of flash point.
When the first Wamakko’s electoral victory was nullified by Court of Appeal in Kaduna and election re-run consequently conducted with him emerging again as the governor, there was the expectation that the hostility between the two camps would subside. The re-election of the governor was seen as something that should have made each group to sheath its sword so that the state could have some peace.
What is, however, still coming out of the state in terms of attacks and counter-attacks is eroding any hope that the politicians in the state, especially the key ones among them, are any cautious.
What is happening in Sokoto State which has an established traditionof political stability is quite unprecedented. Since the colonial times when it served as the seat of the famous Othmaniyya caliphate, Sokoto had been able to retain its peace until quite recently when politics was turned into something else.
Still, observers of development in the state want to give the political players benefit of the doubt. There is currently a strong hope that both sides will, more appropriately, reflect on the situation and make necessary adjustments with a view to re-creating an atmosphere of peace.
It is alright for Wamakko to carry out a probe against Bafarawa administration if he has convincing reasons to do so as this does not depart from the normal practice in democracy. Probes that may even lead to some legal actions are not bad as long as they are not carried out to intimidate and victimize political opponents.
On its side, the Bafarawa’s camp should always realize that the present government belongs to its rivals and will therefore explore all available avenues to further decimate its base. With this kind of understanding, it will not be tempted to indulge in any act that can spell down for the state.
The damages in the politics of Sokoto State are not beyond repairs. It will only take the adoption of proper attitudes by both sides for a reasonable amount of political stability to be attained once again.

 


©2005 New Nigerian Newspapers Limited.